Telecom and Tech Players Weigh in on Selective App Banning 

Telecom and technology stakeholders have voiced their views regarding the Department of Telecommunications’ (DoT) consideration of selectively banning certain apps. The Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (TRAI) had initiated discussions on the targeted prohibition of apps, providing the government with the ability to ban specific applications, like WhatsApp, in particular geographic areas as needed for national security concerns, rather than imposing internet-wide restrictions. 

In response, the Cellular Operators Association of India (COAI) proposed that messaging services be subjected to a regulated licensing framework. This regulatory approach would grant the government the authority to restrict access to messaging apps like WhatsApp and Telegram when deemed necessary. 

Telecommunication companies reiterated their stance on sharing in the revenue generated by internet-based messaging and calling services. Their fundamental argument revolves around the significant investments they make in network infrastructure and the expenses incurred in managing traffic from apps like WhatsApp, which enable users to make voice calls and send texts.

 

Critics of selective app banning argued that determined users would invariably find alternative means to communicate with others, undermining the government’s primary objective. According to a reports, the Broadband India Forum asserted that such selective bans would prove ineffective, as tech-savvy consumers could easily identify alternative methods to maintain communication. Consequently, the intended government objectives would not be achieved by these selective bans, resulting in only temporary disruptions without substantial impact. 

Internet bans, while sometimes seen as hampering everyday activities for the general public, such as bill payments and ride-hailing, have led to the consideration of selective app bans as a potential solution. Nevertheless, it remains evident that even with selective bans, resourceful consumers will find alternative avenues for communication through various applications. 

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Consumer Bodies Oppose TRAI Move to Scrap Complaint Appeals Advisory Committee
Telecom Industry

Consumer Bodies Oppose TRAI Move to Scrap Complaint Appeals Advisory Committee

Summary: Consumer organisations have opposed TRAI’s proposal to remove the advisory committee involved in telecom complaint appeals, arguing that it provides an important independent voice for consumers. While telecom operators support transferring appellate authority to senior company officials, consumer groups believe the move could lead to bias and have instead suggested modernising the committee through […]

Read More
Reliance Jio Denies Involvement in Telegram Routing Issue
Telecom Industry

Reliance Jio Denies Involvement in Telegram Routing Issue

Summary: Reliance Jio has denied claims linking its network to an alleged Telegram internet routing issue, stating that it had no involvement in any reported BGP (Border Gateway Protocol) misconfiguration. The company said its network operates according to global routing standards and follows industry best practices for reliability, security, and transparency. The clarification came after […]

Read More
Airtel Renames Priority Postpaid Service as Fast Lane
Telecom Industry

Airtel Renames Priority Postpaid Service as Fast Lane

Summary: Bharti Airtel has rebranded its “Priority” postpaid offering as “Fast Lane” while continuing to provide the same 5G network-slicing technology that delivers enhanced speeds and performance for eligible postpaid customers. The company said the change is part of its branding strategy and does not affect the service, which continues to offer benefits such as […]

Read More
Copyright @ 2025 Bharatnet. All rights reserved.